In her recent letter to the editor, Susanne Weil confidently declared Donald Trump’s concerns about election fraud “completely wrong,” relying on familiar talking points about “60 judges dismissing his cases.”
Her argument sounded authoritative until you examine the record — especially in Georgia.
Georgia was decided by 11,779 votes. Margins that small demand scrutiny. Washington state understood this in 2004, when the Gregoire-Rossi gubernatorial race — decided by just 133 votes — triggered recounts, litigation and a statewide review of election procedures.
No one argued such a narrow result should be accepted without rigorous examination.
Georgia deserved at least that level of diligence, yet Weil treated it as a settled matter. Newly unsealed federal documents contradict her certainty. A recently released FBI affidavit — drafted by the Biden administration but only made public now — identifies significant defects in Fulton County’s 2020 election process: missing or incomplete ballot images, ballots scanned multiple times during recounts, audit tally inconsistencies, and absentee ballot irregularities that raise legitimate questions about handling and authentication. The affidavit does not declare the election invalid, but it does state that if these defects were intentional, they could constitute violations of federal law.
That alone undermines her claim that Trump’s concerns were “completely wrong.” They were not invented out of thin air; they were rooted in defects federal investigators now treat as potentially criminal if deliberate. Weil’s letter was published after these documents were unsealed, yet she wrote as if they did not exist.
Any reliance on the Georgia Secretary of State’s report is equally misplaced. That report evaluated whether ballots were legitimate — not the process that produced them. It did not address chain of custody gaps, contradictions in the State Farm Arena timeline, or the communication failures that led observers and reporters to leave before counting resumed. It did not explain why ballot containers stored under tables were only pulled out after observers left, nor why state officials later called the facility and directed scanning to continue under minimal observation.
These omissions matter. Georgia’s margin was small enough that documented defects could have influenced the outcome, and Fulton County was the largest source of Biden’s margin in the state. Pretending these defects do not exist is not analysis; it is avoidance.
Her claim that “60 judges dismissed Trump’s cases” is also misleading. Many were dismissed on procedural grounds — standing, jurisdiction, timing — meaning courts never heard the evidence. A procedural dismissal does not mean the underlying claim was false; it means the court declined to consider it.
A fair and correct election process is the minimum standard in a constitutional republic. When a state is decided by fewer than 12,000 votes and its largest county shows documented flaws now under federal scrutiny, it is irresponsible to declare the controversy “settled.” Georgia alone shows last week’s letter lacked the depth and factual grounding required to dismiss Trump’s claims.
The public deserves better than premature declarations built on incomplete information. China is a story for another time.
Ray Anderson
Ethel
