Tyler Bounds, a member of the Bigfoot Field Research Organization, shows off two footprint casts of what his group believes could be a Sasquatch. Bounds and others were on a weekend research trip last Saturday near Elbe. They regularly scour Washington and Oregon for evidence of the mythical hairy ape-man.

    ELBE — He stands 9 feet tall with stringy brown fur all over his body and glowing red eyes, and if he truly does exist, he probably lives in a forest near you.

The ape-like beast known as Sasquatch is mere legend to skeptics, but to members of the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization, he is a legitimate scientific conundrum. The group regularly scours areas in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest and other wooded parts of the state in search of “squatches” — that’s right — plural Sasquatch.

Based on sightings reported by BFRO’s Web site, Washington state is effectively Bigfoot central, more specifically the densely covered Cascade foothills of Southwest Washington. The group believes Sasquatches live in complex communities with advanced social norms and complex forms of communication, including their own language.

    “These people who live here, if you could get them to talk to you, they would tell you, ‘We hear them all the time,’” said Scott Taylor, a particularly active member of BFRO who led a group of eight people on a research trip near Mount Rainier National Park last Saturday. “We try to come out to places like this to meet the witnesses and sit and talk and let them get it off their chest, because many of them have been bottling it up for years.”

    The group’s claim to fame is the “Skookum Cast,” a body impression of an ape-like figure found in the Skookum Meadow, in the southern portion of the Gifford Pinchot. It was unveiled in 2000 and studied by the late Washington State University anthropologist Grover Krantz, who dedicated much of his career to studying Bigfoot, along with the Kennewick Man — skeletal remains of a prehistoric man found on the Columbia River in 1996.

    Taylor, a retired U.S. Marine and engineer by trade who lives in Spanaway, said Lewis County is one of his most common areas of investigation, and he experienced one of his five Sasquatch sightings while deer hunting south of Mossyrock in December. He said his attention peaked when he heard the characteristic Sasquatch “scream.”

    “It’s high-pitched like a chimp, but with much more timbre, like a growl. You experience a primal sense of fear,” Taylor said. “I scanned the slope and saw a creature on all fours dart from one tree to another. And that’s common when they come into contact with people. They’ll get low to avoid being seen.”

    Tyler Bounds, a Stanwood man also on the expedition, said he has spent time on old logging roads outside Morton, where he saw trees jammed into the ground with root structures facing upward. He said he heard a strange growl on the excursion.

    “It sounded like a monster,” he said.

    But in the world of Bigfoot, the believers are clearly outnumbered. A total lack of bones, plus purposeful attempts at Sasquatch hoaxing serve only to bolster the case for skeptics.

    “It serves them no purpose to be seen by us. How often do we find bones of bears or cougars? They quickly decay,” Taylor said. “And it’s pretty easy to tell what’s real and what is a hoax.”

    Another member of the expedition Saturday says he has never seen a Sasquatch. He said he’s a federally funded anthropologist, but declined to give his name.

    “Once you start looking into the evidence and reading books and all .. the idea that it’s all hoaxing and misidentification, I don’t know, is it a collective hallucination?” he said. “It seems more reasonable to start looking at the idea that these things really exist.”

Bigfoot Hoaxer Ray Wallace Has Roots in Toledo

    Perhaps the most famous Bigfoot hoaxer of all time hailed from Toledo.

    Ray Wallace, apparently with the help of a Toledo friend, Rant Mullins, wanted to play a trick on Northern California miners in the 1950s when he was on a road-building project. Wallace made a wooden cast from an outline of a friend’s foot expanded by three times and left impressions in the ground near logging sites.

    According to interviews with Wallace’s family, the hoax began as a way to deter people from vandalizing the sites but later developed into a lifelong hobby. The fake tracks helped coin the term “Bigfoot” in a headline of the Humboldt Times in Eureka, Calif.

    Wallace died in 2002, but is survived by family still in the area. Bigfoot believers generally don’t buy the Wallace hoax because its announcement came after his death when family members found the foot pressings after sorting through his old junk. The Bigfoot faithful also take particular umbrage with what they say are fabricated quotes in a 2002 article by the New York Times calling Wallace’s passing “the death of Bigfoot.”

“He used to mess with us kids. Then he made those tracks at a camp down there in California — ‘course they got up the next morning real excited,” said Dale Wallace, Ray’s 76-year-old nephew who lives in Toledo. “Yep, he was a real character.”

    The following are Bigfoot-related news snippets from The Chronicle’s archives:

    April 12, 1982 — A retired Toledo logger said he helped create the legends of a Bigfoot creature around Mount St. Helens. Rant Mullens, 86, said he and his uncle were returning from a fishing trip in 1924 and decided to throw a scare into some miners in the area. They rolled rocks over the edge and hightailed away. Later the three miners from Kelso reported seeing huge, hairy, apelike creatures that hurled boulders down upon their cabin. The miners said they fought off the creatures with rifle fire.

    Mullens said he built on the legend four years later, when he whittled giant feet out of green alder wood and a friend stomped around the banks of the Muddy River, leaving tracks for berry pickers to notice.

    “I tell you, people will believe just about anything,” the solitary, retired logger said from his home in Toledo.

    April 19, 1982 — H. Woodman, Napavine, wrote a letter to the editor saying he saw a Bigfoot creature in 1953.

    “Going home one evening on the Rutledge Road in the Littlerock area, I drove around a corner and saw a single animal — I thought it was a bear standing on its hind legs in the road. It was taller than a 6-foot man and was brown in color. It ran across the road, leaped a split rail fence and was gone in four or five seconds.

    “Sometime later, I read some literature and remembered this sighting. The animal had hind legs that were of human proportions. A bear’s hind legs are short compared to its body. When it ran away at great speed it did not run on four legs but ran erect as a man would. A bear would run on all fours... I know what I saw and the only proof I need is to remember that it was erect when it ran away.”

    Feb. 10, 1997 — Ruth Steele, 73, was convinced that a Bigfoot creature was roaming the hills near her home in Dryad.

    “No question about it, I seen it ... I’m not hallucinating — I’ve got a good mind.”

    She believed she had seen either a Sasquatch or some kind of alien three times in six months. She didn’t carry a camera with her those times, but she had begun to. All the sightings took place near rural Doty and Dryad on the semiforested River Road.

    The 7-foot-something tall humanoid was covered with gray, white and sometimes black fur, she said. The animal’s face appeared pink skinned. The furry creature walked upright and wore no clothing. In the most recent sighting, in January, the creature heard her car, turned and looked directly at her. Its eyes shone red.

    “It shocked the devil out of me when I seen it,” Steele said. “I thought what in God’s name is that? ... He wasn’t no human. He’s never nothing I’d seen in the woods.”

    During a recent sighting her daughter, Debra Steele, 41, also saw the creature. “It looked me right in the face — it scared the pants right off of me,” the younger Steele said.

    Aug. 5, 2001 —  The public had its first chance to see the Skookum Cast, a plaster casting of what might be Bigfoot. Wildlife biologist Dr. LeRoy Fish, Oregon, said the heel had what appeared to be a callus.

    The 3½ by 5 foot chunk of plaster held the reverse imprint of what Fish and Kevin Lindley of Mossyrock said was an unknown primate.

    The impression had been discovered in Skookum Meadow in Skamania County in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest, between Mount St. Helens and Mount Adams.

    Bigfoot skeptics say Wallace could have been behind famous tracks found at the Ape Cave near Mount St. Helens.   

Reported Bigfoot Sightings in Lewis County

1967

Winlock — “The Brinson Monster” — Startled by a tall standing beast, high school kids who were out for a night of beer drinking at their regular spot return with a rifle and attempt to kill Bigfoot.

1969

White Pass — A Washington State University student sees a roadside Sasquatch who was startled by his headlights and then stepped over the guardrail on U.S. Highway 12.

1980

Packwood — Man reports a large scream from an animal running across the back side of the High Valley Country Club.

1990

Morton — Two men cutting cedar shake blocks near a creek hear a peculiar scream on an old logging road.

1994

Mineral — Two friends see a “dirty white” Sasquatch picking branches from a crab apple tree near a farm.

1996

Morton — Two people spot a Sasquatch bathing in a pond and periodically slapping the water with huge hands.

1998

Randle — Two hunters hear unusual “whoop howl” in stand of old growth forest.

2000

Morton — Mother and daughter see “large animal with long reddish brown hair” cross the road.

Morton — Woman stops her vehicle to look at what she thinks is a bear in a roadside ditch, but when it stood up, she thought it was a gorilla. She said the Sasquatch appeared to be injured and bleeding and had a “sad look” as it crossed the road in front of her car.

2001

White Pass — Family traveling from Tacoma report a Sasquatch standing in the road.

2002

Mossyrock — Riffe Lake fisherman and his son see a Sasquatch walking in a clear-cut forest near the shore.

Randle — A man and his wife are awakened by a loud scream similar to a peacock, but louder and with more timbre. The man went outside and mimicked the call and was answered six times.

Packwood — Elk hunter is spooked to find giant footprints in snow.

2003

Morton — Night watchmen for a logging company hear a strange short scream with a deep tone and two days later describe a figure “like Andre the Giant stepping over a rope.”

2004

Doty — A dozen teenagers camping at Rainbow Falls State Park hear a strange scream after putting out their camp fire.

Mossyrock — A wife and her husband hear two strange screams while out elk hunting and camping near a clear-cut forest.

2005

Salkum — A man driving down a dead-end country road sees a nondescript “gray patch” get up and move two steps into the woods.

2006

Doty — A man hunting in a wooded area comes into direct contact with a Sasquatch, which screamed at him and then “said something” he couldn’t understand.

2007

Winlock — A man lets his dogs run in his back yard when he hears a strange scream come from Olequa Creek.

2009

Salkum — Three men sitting in a drift boat on the south side of the Cowlitz River hear a sound like a “chimp screaming” from dense brush directly across the river. They said the sound carried on wailing for a minute or more.

SOURCE: Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization

 

 

Recommended for you

(30) comments

rockstarlizzy

When I need some help explaining the culture of Lewis County to my international friends, I will share this video. Thanks!

Cinebarbarian

No hair ever found. No droppings. No teeth imprints. Nothing physical to do DNA off of. But Hey, Everyone needs a hobby.
No harm in running around the woods with a camera; the further in the woods the better...

timsan

Here's a link that you might want to check out before making such grossly misleading and just plain ignorant comments (teeth imprints?)...
http://www.sacred-texts.com/lcr/abs/index.htm
Then if you're really brave, you can venture to the BFRO site itself to check out all of their evidence... www.bfro.net
Then again, why not just keep your head stuck firmly in your, uh, I mean, the sand? The deeper, the better.

Cinebarbarian

Went there and found nothing scientific nor creditable evidence.
As someone who spent a lot of time studying physical anthropology, I'll concede this much.
Bigfoot is something some people believe in for various reasons.
Some for what they saw or heard and others through faith based on what others saw or heard.
Without the physical evidence, it's all a matter of believing based on faith. When one if found, then it ceases to be a faith based belief and becomes fact. If that day ever comes, remind me and I'll happily buy you a stake dinner while I dine on cold crow...

PS. Yes teeth imprints.
All primitive primates chew on roots, barks and other hard foods leaving behind DNA and teeth marks.

GonFishin

I have lived most of my life in the great NW woods and though I have never seen or heard anything that one could construe as a BF siting I do feel there is something to all the sitings.

timsan your comment irritates me like only the ignorant can, Cine's comment holds true and a ton of books does not hard evidence make.

msharak

The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true science and art. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed.

Albert Einstein

jiggaplz

Lord they have neglected the Boistfort Valley, you go out there and can find a dozen people who will tell you about all the times they saw Bigfoot. And then when you see them next week they'll you again. And again, and again...

HeavyHemi

Geeze that 'guy' needs arch supports. Those casts, in my opinion are, obviously fakes. Feet are not board flat and something of that size (given the curious oddity of the detailed toes) would leave a more defined 3D impression.

strangetruth

Hey Cinebarbarian, You are just so smart, you must be a college grad. You studied physical anthropology, huh? Well, I guess you should go back and study some more because there certainly is DNA proof. Hair, scat and blood were found and tested by several universities in the Northwest and Britain. Britain found that it was ''no known primate''.. Go to the Oregon Bigfoot website and READ. Wake up..!!! Oh, and by the way, you're right about teeth imprints, they have been the main evidence in murder trials that wound up in convictions. They would be excellent forensic evidence....

timsan

Cinebarbarian,

Holy smoke, you read a 500 page book complete with numerous maps, photos, etc. AND a website which is well over 500 pages and found NOTHING credible or scientific. Yes, I am sure my comments are irritating when I hold up over 1,000 pages of documentation and you guys can dismiss ALL of it in, what, less than a day! Wow, you're really thorough, eh? Must be that scientific principle at work there...

His comments 'hold true'? What does that even mean besides 'fits my worldview'?

Teeth imprints....still cracks me up.

timsan

Wow, you dismiss an entire 500 page book and a who-knows-how-many page website in less than a day! You are very thorough. Must be that scientific principle at work.

His comments 'hold true'? What does that even mean besides 'fits my worldview'?

No, books don't make hard evidence. The hard evidence is inside the books.

rainnsurf

You can't hike anywhere in the Pacific Northwest, I I mean anywhere, where you don't find sign of humans. There are pop cans, beer cans, and other pieces of human waste her there and every where. The mythical dark untouched forest does not exist, has not existed for quite some time. If there really were a Bigfoot, he would have been photographed tied to the hood of some hunter's car 50 years ago. Heck, hunters can't keep from shooting each other, If a species like Bigfoot were out there, one would be dead already. I think Ray Wallace is in heaven laughing at all the Bigfoot believers. But hey, keep coming to lewis county and spending your money while you look. All of us uneducated hicks can use the economic boost.

timsan

Cinebarbarian dismisses a whole 500-1000 pages (from multiple authors) in a mere 24 hours and now Rainnsurf claims knowledge of all the forest in the PNW??!!

Let me get this straight. You find trash everywhere you hike so you figure the whole PNW must be explored and littered with trash? Brilliant logic.

Maybe you guys can answer some questions I have on the significance of Ardi and the amount of litter in the Northwest Territories...

HeavyHemi

I would have thought timsan that the website (which you apparently decree as the Holy Grail for Sasquatch facts) dedicated to proving existence of Sasquatch, would have cited more than this on their FRONT PAGE as 'undisputed facts' :

What are the undisputed facts about the bigfoot / sasquatch mystery?

It's a fact that for more than 400 years people have reported seeing large, hair-covered, man-like animals in the wilderness areas of North America.

It is a fact that sightings of these animals continue today. Real or not, these reports are often made by people of unimpeachable character.

It is a fact that, for over seventy years, people have been finding, photographing, and casting sets of very large human-shaped tracks. Most are discovered by chance in remote areas. These tracks continue to be found to this day.

It is a fact that the cultural histories of many Native American and First Nation peoples include stories and beliefs about non-human "peoples" of the wild. Many of these descriptions bear a striking resemblance to the hairy man-like creatures reported today.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Well it's a 'fact' that people all over the world have reported ghosts, UFO's, miracles, alien abductions assorted supernatural events and on and on for centuries.. The mere fact of such reports while interesting, isn't proof. Do those casts of of feet really look genuine to you just using your common sense?

Also, overstating the evidence, in example:

"Well, I guess you should go back and study some more because there certainly is DNA proof. Hair, scat and blood were found and tested by several universities in the Northwest and Britain. Britain found that it was ''no known primate''

This is not an accurate statement. The blood sample was degraded and there was a 1 in 5000 chance it MIGHT be a hominid source. Neither the hair or scat provided DNA PROOF as you called it. So, essentially, even after all these years, Bigfoot occupies the same space as UFO's.

timsan

No, I never said it was the holy grail. It's only one (probably the best in my opinion) of many websites about this creature. Not to mention all the research that comes out of Russia, China, etc. The book (in the link) basically paints the same picture - a phenomenon which is worldwide and centuries old.

I would never judge the phenomenon by looking at one example of casts in the newspaper. I also wouldn't judge it by other 'widespread phenomena' just because they're both widespread. These are basic errors of logic.

To say there is no evidence for UFOs, Sasquatch, etc. is extremely narrow-minded. If one dismisses ALL of the personal narratives, then you might as well be arguing against the existence of God.

Just remember that not long ago folks believed in a flat earth, didn't know about gravity, etc. and a lot of other stuff we take for granted nowadays. What else don't we know? What will be the next big "discovery"? Or will it simply be an official "recognition"? Scientists suspected the existence of quarks long before they actually 'observed' them. Now quarks are considered fact.

HeavyHemi

Sigh...lets examine your reply

I would never judge the phenomenon by looking at one example of casts in the newspaper. I also wouldn't judge it by other 'widespread phenomena' just because they're both widespread. These are basic errors of logic.


>>>>>


I wasn't judging just using a simple allegorical device.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

To say there is no evidence for UFOs, Sasquatch, etc. is extremely narrow-minded. If one dismisses ALL of the personal narratives, then you might as well be arguing against the existence of God.


>>>>>>

I did not say there was "no evidence". That is not an accurate claim at all. I merely noted the FACTS cited on a web cite you vouched for was quite weak on 'facts' supporting the existence of Bigfoot. And what did exist the claims were exaggerated.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Just remember that not long ago folks believed in a flat earth, didn't know about gravity, etc. and a lot of other stuff we take for granted nowadays. What else don't we know? What will be the next big "discovery"? Or will it simply be an official "recognition"? Scientists suspected the existence of quarks long before they actually 'observed' them. Now quarks are considered fact.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Uh no, actually the earth being a sphere was established over 200 hundred centuries ago and except for fringe groups there was not a belief in the 'flat Earth.
Now this is interesting that you're engaging in the same 'logical fallacy' by citing quarks and gravity 'other things we don't know' which have nothing to do with whether or not Bigfoot exists. Now, do those casts look genuine to you? Yes or no.

HeavyHemi

Oops 200 centuries not 200 hundred centuries,,,now that would be a bit too far back. Look up Eratosthenes..re: flat Earth...

bedrock

Why is he holding the casts from the criple?

bedrock

I think it would be nice if the B.F.R.O. would start to focus more on the investigators and people in the organization that have got and collected evidence and stuff like video footage and pictures.
There are a couple investigators that out way all others and have had multiple sightings and have obtained very good pictures and a number of videos, but these have not been given the credit nor the recognition they deserve.

bedrock

The prints, allegedly, are from tracks made by an individual called Cripplefoot and found in the snow by a local butcher near a Bossburg, Wash., garbage dump in 1969. Krantz donated the casts to the museum in 1970.

Why is he holding them in the picture?

timsan

Please don't take all of my comments personally, heavy. I didn't say that you had said 'no evidence'. Try 20 centuries..

If you did not mean to appear judgmental, could you please explain the purpose of your allegorical device? Spell it out for me.

I related the issue of the discovery/recognition of quarks to suggest that even laboratory scientists can understand something (by the way it affects other known particles) before they actually see this unknown something themselves. This fact (it's really not an argument) does not support the existence of Bigfoot nor was it meant to. In the same way, I could also use the now very well-accepted argument (mathematical probabillity) in favor of extra-terrestrial life to support the possibility of UFOs. Does it prove UFOs? No. Is it evidence? No. It's just a fact for some people who may begin to think that IF extra-terrestrials exist then they MAY be able to space-travel as we do (or even much better than we do).

I understand you think the casts don't look genuine. Is there any particular reason why you think so? Please provide specific evidence and avoid the allegorical devices if you don't mind...

Cinebarbarian

All your personal attacks have still done nothing to bolster up any physical proof.
Yes you have managed to derail the conversation from the lack of proof to making fun of folks who point out the lack of proof. You really should be running for an office somewhere; your pretty good at this!
I've seen the websites before and others like it and have also done a lot of reading over the years on the subject; not just in 24 hours but thanks for thinking I can read faster than Data on STNG. Each culture has it's own "boogie man" and our local cultures are no different. Those images get burned into our minds at a young age.
Do honest God fearing people believe they saw one? Absolutely! No question about it. Never said they were telling a tall tail or any sort of fabrication. Lots of good honest people believe in something that is in the end is just not true. The subject of religion comes to mind. If all the Christians are right then the Hindus are wrong and vise versa. Never said either group was bad, just that one is wrong. (Can't believe I opened that can of worms).
Believe what you wish and have fun with it. Just allow others to not believe with the same respect. The world needs big foot infidels too you know. And like I said, show me the body, DNA (besides the possum blood mixed with bear hair in Georgia or the "Inclusive DNA hair" which turned out to be fake fur) or other tangible indigenous body component and I'll buy you a dinner while I dine on cold crow. In fact I would absolutely LOVE to be wrong about this and experience the thrill of seeing a lost creature from the fog of time come to life for the world to see.
I hope to be proven wrong some day. Until then, quoting stacks of books that quote each other or fruitless sightings without physical proof does not add up to proving anything but the absence of the animal. Habitués Corpus. Not Habitués stories.

PS. that's my last word on the subject. Too much going on in the world to argue on the internet over the absence of a species...

rainnsurf

I guess I have to agree with Cinebarbarian on this one. It would be awesome to find one but given the fact that there is no dead one's head stuffed and mounted on the wall of any of our local taverns, and given the sheer quantity of armed outdoorsmen trapsing through the woods each year, I just can't deem it reasonable to believe in this creature. But hey, keep visiting us BFRO and bring your money with you. By the way Timsan, when you criticize another's logic, it's better if you don't commit a fallacy yourself. You committed a straw man fallacy. You argued that I claimed personal knowledge of the enter PNW. I did no such thing, but you did a great job of arguing against something I didn't say. I did however claim that all of the PNW is or has been explored. That sir is a fact and as been for several decades now.

HeavyHemi

Me: Well lets deconstruct timsan again....sigh...

Timsan "I didn't say that you had said 'no evidence'".

Me: Yes indeed you did and you said I was narrow minded. Were you referring to someone else?

Timsan: "To say there is no evidence for UFOs, Sasquatch, etc. is extremely narrow-minded. If one dismisses ALL of the personal narratives, then you might as well be arguing against the existence of God."

Timsan: "If you did not mean to appear judgmental, could you please explain the purpose of your allegorical device? Spell it out for me."

Me: I'm not going to defend your opinion I was judgmental. That's your job.

Timsan. "I would never judge the phenomenon by looking at one example of casts in the newspaper.

Me: I was commenting SOLELY on the casts not the Bigfoot phenomena . Don't take this personally but you have very bad habit of making sweeping assumptions well beyond what was actually posted.

Timsan: "I also wouldn't judge it by other 'widespread phenomena' just because they're both widespread. These are basic errors of logic"

Me: Well then you've more or less refuted your entire point of bringing up, quarks, UFO's and other phenomena. It would be extremely helpful if you would maintain some sort of consistency of logic.

Timsana; I understand you think the casts don't look genuine. Is there any particular reason why you think so? Please provide specific evidence and avoid the allegorical devices if you don't mind...

Me: I was crystal clear in my original comment. Here it is again:
"Those casts in my opinion, are obviously fakes. Feet are not board flat and something of that size (given the curious oddity of the detailed toes) would leave a more defined 3D impression.
Do you have an opinion of the casts or not. If so, what is it. Thanks.,

timsan

The height of hypocrisy. Was I telling you 'there is nothing credible or scientifc'? All I argued for was the existence of some facts which you apparently cannot abide. If your position is that only a body will prove they exist, that is your prerogative, but what constitutes proof is not the issue. We are discussing what constitutes evidence.

You cannot simply deny the existence of all the other physical evidence (not proof) from all over the world which has accumulated steadily in modern times. I provided two links which you summarily dismissed! This is where you disallow others to believe - in evidence. And then on top of it, I am the one making personal attacks and should be a politician. Very rich indeed!

HeavyHemi

Timsan, I think it would be helpful if you identified who you're insulting. :)

Anyhow, I don't see were you answered my question on the casts. I answered yours, how about reciprocating?

timsan

Rain, when someone claims that 'you cannot hike anywhere in the PNW without seeing signs of humans / there is no wilderness anymore', then one is claiming knowledge of the whole of the PNW. Do you really believe one cannot hike in the PNW and see no one and nothing man-made for days and weeks?

Heavy, In case you haven't noticed, I have 3 people to deal with here. It was cinebarbarian who said he visited my links and claimed nothing credible or scientific and that's the reason for my comment 'to say that there is no evidence is narrow-minded.' I never claimed it was you.

I compared the sasquatch mystery to UFOs and quarks to make specific points about nature of inquiry, the absense of tangible evidence, etc. I am not equating the belief in UFOs (due to mathematical probablity) or the discovery of quarks (after their postulation) to anything related to Bigfoot. They are simply facts which might come to bear as someone considers the scientific method and what counts as evidence or not.

But thanks for your words of wisdom ("it's not proof just cause a lot of folks believe it"), your allegorical device (Bigfoots occupies the 'same space' as UFOs), and your sharp analysis of those casts in the story (look flat, weird toes, etc).

Thanks for the edumacation fellas!

timsan

Uh, no you didn't, Heavy. When you said you weren't being judgmental by comparing squatch with other phenomenon (all of which are metaphysical) and that was just a 'device', I asked you to elaborate on your device and you declined. That is an unanswered question.

HeavyHemi

Well now, we can see just what kind of person you are timsan. That was a dishonest 'device' you just used. I don't believe you honestly reciprocated on any issue you were questioned on. You also consistently mis-characterized what others posted. Very disappointing.

blobsquatch11

May I first state that I am not desputing any evidence so-far collected supporting the existance of such a creature. Having said this, I will now point out that nomatter how much evidence is collected, without a live or dead creature in captivity, there is nothing to compare said evidence to inorder to prove what you have found as evidence, to be evidence of what you believe it to be.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.