The recent mass shootings prompted my niece to post on Facebook about the media’s penchant to publicize such tragedy. She believed coverage of the shootings just encourages more shootings.

“What if we didn’t publicize mass shootings so much, so quickly,” she wrote. “What if we all took a break from arguing, or claiming sides and focused more on just being good people and setting good examples?”

She had more to say. She said the shootings are politicized, with some people using it to push their agenda of gun control, and the push back from the other side. She said that back and forth hasn’t helped in the past. But she offered a solution, one that newspapers can help push.

“Maybe people should spend more time being present, building trust, communicating, setting a good example, making good decisions, being good parents, family members and friends, supporting one another, all things that can build a better community. Because you never know, you could change someone’s life, or be someone’s saving grace. You could very well prevent another horrible incident from occurring, or change the future of our country. … I firmly believe we can change that over time if we put in a little effort.”

My response:

 “I think blaming it on the media’s extensive coverage is misguided. I think we have always had angry, unstable people causing violence, and with 330 million people living in the United States, the chance someone will snap is high. When other nations have mass killings, it is also publicized to a great extent. The question, and I don’t have the answer, is why does the USA have vastly more than their share of mass killings? Blaming it on the media is just too easy.”

Sarah agreed. We will always have angry people, she said. We can’t prevent violence. But she said, “maybe we can at least try. Try and prevent those people from snapping. And maybe open up the idea that it’s not always just one thing causing these things to happen. That it may be more complex.”

“And I don’t know why these things are happening more in America than other countries either, but my hunch is because we haven’t been paying attention and we’ve gotten pretty lazy over the years. I personally think we’ve created a lot of monsters. And it’s going to be a lot of work to re-align and/or come back from the damage we’ve done. And it doesn’t seem like that’s the answer people want to hear. So they stick with ban this or ban that instead of taking responsibility for what might be their very own fault.”

I’ve always believed that newspapers should reflect life, which is both good and bad. It is easy to report on the shootings, on crime, on a fatal crash, embezzlement and the like. But it takes effort to focus on the good, and we need to make sure that is a priority.

The good newspapers of this state do a great job being watchdogs on society, making sure the rich and powerful are in check when they get out of hand. I am proud of these efforts. But it is not enough. It is important to shine light on the efforts of our community to help others. I think of such efforts in my community, for example, to collect items to give to students as they go back to school. I think the message to those less fortunate that people care about them goes a long way.

This week I interviewed a woman who is collecting donations to pay for sunscreen to give to our troops overseas. She also donates facial care items to a local retirement center for 64 residents. She agrees with one of my main tenants in life: She said, “When you give, God gives you abundance back. It is not always financial, it is in blessings in other ways.”

My niece is married to a Navy Seal, trained as a medic. He has seen more than his share of the bad in society. He has held friends as they bled out.

His wife, my niece, gave birth to a daughter this past weekend. I will fly down at Thanksgiving to meet our newest gem. I can’t wait. In two months her father will be deployed once again to the Mideast.

I can see him coming back from a tough day in the field and opening up a care package from strangers such as the sunscreen. I think it would give him a bit of hope, a bit of sunshine, a message that humanity is not lost.

I asked Sarah if it mattered to the troops.

She write, “Care packages go a long way. Especially in those ‘combat zones’ where there’s minimal down time and/or higher stress levels. … Troops very much appreciate the support back home. I think it makes a huge difference.”

Sarah has it wrong in blaming the media, but she is onto something when it comes to helping others. 

•••

Michael Wagar is the president of Lafromboise Communications and the publisher of The Chronicle. He can be reached at mwagar@chronline.com.

 

Recommended for you

(3) comments

1Skeptic2

First, “mass killings” on a per capita basis show a number of other countries with greater incidence. Anyone with a search engine can verify this. Constant misrepresentation of discoverable facts is what gives rise to the term “fake news.”



Secondly, I have to agree with Sarah. Extensive media coverage _does_ encourage mass killers. Several of them, especially the younger ones, have stated they want to go out with a “bang,” and have indicated their role models are other mass killers - made infamous by media coverage. Had media not put their names and faces before the public for weeks on end and spotlighted them for years afterward, no one would have even heard of them.



Third, there’s just no doubt that by harping and screeching on the subject, the MSM has instilled a phobia about “mass shooters” in the public, especially the youngsters, that’s simply not justified by the facts. Just like fear of flying - the safest form of mass transit available - fear of a school shooting is unwarranted. Any given student is far, far more likely to be killed or injured on the way to or from school than in any shooting incident while in school. The odds aren’t even close, but students are way more fearful of a school shooting than driving to get there, and that’s almost exclusively at the instigation of the MSM spoon-fed by various “gun safety” groups (which have never published nor presented a single lesson on gun “safety”!).



While the mantra “if it bleeds, it leads” might be better for a publisher’s bottom line, it certainly doesn’t do much for the psyche of America. We’ve gone from the “land of the free and the home of the brave” to the “land of the nanny-state and the home of the fearful” with much of the credit belonging to the MSM.



The MSM isn’t responsible for mass killings per se, but it certainly isn’t blameless for exploiting same.


HeavyHemi

Good, use facts:



https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/16/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/







Clearly you're not. As the facts show your base premise is faulty, based on the facts, the rest that follows, is suspect, of course. You're welcome. You were hoping, I guess, we would just take your word for it. In the age of Trump, that's no longer a given. Sorry.


YourNeighbor

Having spent twenty five years serving our country on active duty in our armed forces, you want to know what “goes a long way” with these troops in combat zones? Not being in one. You think baby wipes matter? Really? We are issued everything we need when we deployed to fight some war of convenience. You people need to hear that your feel-good care packages are good for you maybe, but are nearly meaningless to the people sent to brown places to die.


Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.