I keep losing track of just how long we have as humans to survive the apocalypse of global warming, cooling or just climate change. Is it 12 years, 10 years or are we simply too late? 

In some ways I guess it’s easier to plan knowing we’re already lost. My 401K doesn’t have to last as long as I thought, my cars can definitely make it that long, and I don’t need to consider planning college for grandkids.

In the back of my mind though, I wonder if those same prognosticators of doom actually believe that gibberish, or simply want to control more of our lives?

Yeah, I think that’s it.

And speaking of gibberish, I read recently that despite raising gas taxes in 2017, California is looking at taxing drivers by the mile. If I read the story right, they are considering replacing the outdated gas tax with this idea. Replace a tax with another tax? Sounds like our liberal legislature’s ongoing infatuation with an income tax to be more fair.  

Anyone with an ounce of sense who pays taxes knows whether it’s our state or California, they don’t replace taxes, they just add to the ones they have.

To be fair though, they can’t help themselves, spending other people’s money is just what liberal politicians do. But it’s the logic that is kind of interesting here. Because they (government) has demanded cars be more efficient, they are not collecting enough cash at the gas pump to maintain the roads, they say. It’s not how they spend what they get — that couldn’t be part of the problem — it’s just not enough.

So, they’ll consider charging by the mile to encourage (force) us to use the bus or other public transportation, live in cities and stop driving. 

If they are successful, life will be good, they’ll have all the money they need and roads will be good right?

Not likely.

Logic suggests if fewer people drive, the gas tax or tax by the mile revenue will go down and then what?  We’ll almost certainly need more buses, more routes, more bus drivers, and still need roads to drive them on.

They’ll just tax us more elsewhere to pay for their endless spending.

I guess the only surprise here is that our “me too” governor didn’t push this foolishness first. Or maybe he has?

 

•••

 

Memorial Day is upon us and remembering those who sacrificed so much for this country is important. Many kids today have not had to experience this kind of sacrifice and don’t get taught about it, so it’s too easy to forget what can be required to remain the country we are.

Years ago, I had the opportunity to go to Arlington National Cemetery and it’s a sobering experience. From the honor guards attached to stand watch of the tomb of the Unknown Soldier, to the seemingly endless head\stones, it is a reminder that our history and freedoms came at a cost.

But you don’t have to go to Arlington Virginia to be reminded of that sacrifice.  There are National Cemeteries all over this country. My father is buried in one on a hill overlooking San Francisco. 

I’ve been there a couple of times and am always struck by the image of so many head stones representing so many lives.

As they usually do, there will be a number of ceremonies around our county this year to commemorate some of those sacrifices, made for our country. It’s a good time to reflect on them regardless of your politics. Since its founding, our country has called on our young citizens many times, and they have thankfully answered the call.

We can argue, as some do about wars and that’s a fair debate.  

But the freedom to debate and argue is one that is unique in the world and came at a real cost.  This weekend as we celebrate with family and friends, we shouldn’t forget that.

 

•••

John McCroskey was Lewis County sheriff from 1995 to 2005. He lives outside Chehalis, and can be contacted at musingsonthemiddlefork@yahoo.com.

Recommended for you

(5) comments

YourNeighbor

Just think, John. Your grandkids, and everyone else’s, get to live with the climate change you think is a joke. And, your dismissive attitude will be recorded for all time, so they can be sure to remember how you joked about it.

1Skeptic2

"... it’s just not enough."

Words incipient politicians learn while still at their mother's breasts. And never forgotten thereafter.

ghostrider

Government is determined to yank us out of our cars. Seattle has changed their building code so that apartment/condo/building parking is not required. No more of that space wasting parking for residence of downtown Seattle. They also increased the taxes on parking lots. But they seem to have decided that self-driving cars are a necessity as Seattle is one of the chosen cities to test them. Sure makes me want to visit downtown Seattle.

But let's face it. The apparent current purpose of government is to spend money. My reading of early political writings was that government had one purpose - to provide those services that can't be efficiently provided by the level of government below. A neighborhood can't efficiently provide police, fire and EMS, so the city taxes and provides those services. Hence, those services should be coming out of the core budget - even before the expense of government administration. The county needs to protect those people living outside the limits of its cities, so needs to provide police, fire etc by taxing the county residents. The State has similar responsibilities for state highways, etc. The federal government has to protect the country with a standing army. It should also coordinate some of the activities of the various states - uniform traffic laws, interstate commerce, and on and on.


The problems arise when the government begins to overstep its authority - much as all levels of government have done since the Great Depression. Federal government has become a government of taxation without taxing directly. Various federal agencies create rules that the states must follow no matter what, but don't provide the funds. Water handling is just one of these rules. The federal government says that the water must be sanitized to certain levels and the cities and counties and states have to figure out how to do it with their already thin (by overspending) budgets. RAISE TAXES. As long as the voters refuse to vote intelligently (studying the candidates and their programs or voting records and stances on issues) we will continue to get the government we don't want but deserve. Want to change government? Vote against EVERY incumbent. Vote the jerks out and start fresh. And, while we're at it, TERM LIMITS. No more empire building in Congress. I say six years of elected service FOR LIFE. Also, let's force all elected officials to live within their represented area for six years AFTER they've left office. Perhaps we'll start getting some real representation from our elected officials who then go on to be lobbyists. Remember Tom Foley???

Bill M

Good article, John. Remember Governor Rosellini back in the early 60's or was it the 50's? They called him "Taxelini". The man was an novice where taxes are concerned. And then how many times have the voters said "NO" to a state income tax and still the democrats keep pushing for it? I'm sick of the corruption!!!

HeavyHemi

Another garbage commentary by a small minded Lewis County conservative completely oblivious to the trillions in debt his Orange God and the GOP Congress added to the debt. Why is this ignorance given special space to spread their ignorance in this paper?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.