Ruling in Bassett Murder Case, State High Court Rejects Life Without Parole for Youth

Posted

Washington state’s Supreme Court has ruled that sentencing children to life without parole constitutes cruel punishment and is unconstitutional.

Thursday’s 5-4 ruling came in the case of a 39-year-old man who was a teenager when he was convicted of murdering his McCleary family.

Brian Bassett killed his mother, father and 5-year-old brother in 1995 when he was 16. He was convicted of three counts of aggravated first-degree murder.

A judge at the time called him “a walking advertisement” for the death penalty and sentenced him to three consecutive terms of life in prison without the possibility of parole, which was the mandatory sentence at the time.

Bassett and his friend Nicholas J. McDonald were charged with the slayings. According to court testimony, McDonald hid the family’s bodies off a logging road and the two teens stole a family vehicle and fled to California.

Bassett’s parents had kicked him out of the family home roughly a week before, according to Olympian archives.

In its Thursday ruling, the Supreme Court sent Bassett’s case back to the trial court for re-sentencing and said he cannot be sentenced to a minimum term of life in prison, since that amounts to life without parole.

The decision follows a series of recent court rulings both statewide and nationally that address juvenile offenders, based on evolving science that shows the brains of children and young adults are not fully developed.



In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole for juvenile offenders were unconstitutional since they did not take into account the offender’s “diminished culpability and heightened capacity for change.”

In response, the Washington Legislature said state courts should consider “mitigating factors that account for the diminished culpability of youth” — including age, life experience and chances for rehabilitation — before sentencing 16- and 17-year-olds to life without parole.

It also said those who had been sentenced to life without parole as juveniles should be re-sentenced.

Bassett sought relief under that ruling. At his re-sentencing hearing in 2015, a pediatric psychologist who treated him prior to the murders testified Bassett suffered from an adjustment disorder and struggled to cope with the stress from a strained relationship with his parents.

Bassett told the court as a teen he was unable to “comprehend the totality” of his actions, saying his first thought when he was arrested was “how much trouble (he) was going to be in when (his) parents learned that (he) was there in jail,” according to the Supreme Court decision.

The sentencing judge was unmoved, and Bassett again received three consecutive life without parole sentences. Bassett appealed, with his attorneys arguing life sentences without parole for juvenile offenders were unconstitutional.

The state Court of Appeals agreed, and the case went to the Supreme Court.