The Chronicle

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Register or log in below.
   |   
Not you?  |   | 
Logout  |  My Dashboard

Back-and-Forth With Baird

Share
Send this page to your friends
Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Brandon Swanson Back-and-Forth With Baird

Posted: Friday, September 4, 2009 12:00 am | Updated: 12:54 pm, Wed Nov 11, 2009.

    U.S. Rep Brian Baird closed out a tumultuous congressional recess Wednesday with a town hall meeting before a capacity crowd at the Corbet Theatre in Centralia.

    Both the Centralia College theater and a spillover room were completely full about 15 minutes before the start of the two-hour question-and-answer session during which about 20 speakers quizzed the Vancouver Democrat on issues ranging from cap and trade to economic stimulus measures.

    The most frequented topic, however, was the ongoing debate over sweeping health care reform proposed by the Barack Obama Administration and being championed by the Democrat-led Congress.

Baird, a clinical psychologist, repeated what he has said throughout four previous town halls and several telephone conferences over the past weeks.

    “My mind is absolutely not made up,” Baird told the crowd of more than 500.

    While there are currently several versions of reform working through both houses of Congress, each of them deal directly with covering uninsured Americans through the creation of a public health care option that would be subsidized by the government.

    Speakers were selected through a lottery-style process in which potential questioners were given a number which was placed in a barrel tumbler. Moderator Chris Bailey picked speakers randomly.

    Centralia real estate agent J.R. McGee led off the questioning by telling Baird “We’re heading in a very strange direction. … We’re going to what people are running from.”

    “Now it looks like our country is leaning toward ‘give me, give me, give me,’” McGee said.

    Baird said that there is a personal responsibility aspect to the health care reform in that uninsured Americans would no longer be allowed to rely on those with coverage for their medical needs.

    The crowd, which appeared divided between supporters and opponents of the legislation, became boisterous at times, beginning when Baird indicated that he didn’t agree with everything in the bills.

    “I have probably never voted for a single bill of any consequence that I agreed with everything,” Baird said.

    For the most part, the conversation remained calm and civil as Baird paced back and forth, answering questions from speakers at two different microphones on each side of the Corbet Theatre.

    One of the more contentious exchanges of the evening came when Centralia City Council candidate Matthew Trent approached the microphone.

    Trent read quotes from a number of founding fathers, among them Declaration of Independence author and third president Thomas Jefferson.

    Trent, who is opposing Mayor Tim Browning in the November general election, said that he had no doubt Jefferson would consider Baird “an enemy of God and the Republic” for his record on spending and supporting government controls.

    Baird responded strongly, refuting the notion that Jefferson would frown upon his record.

    “It’s not just my ilk, my friend,” Baird said, noting that there was no budget deficit when former President Bill Clinton left office.

    To reign in the ballooning federal deficit, Baird said “everything, everything should be on the table” for potential savings.

    Later, when asked by another questioner about his support for the so-called stimulus measures, he noted that he has been an opponent of wasteful spending, most recently voting against the Cash for Clunkers program.

    “The answer was I would have to beg the Chinese for (the money) and it’s not going to build anything,” he said, adding that he pushed to include money for road construction and infrastructure in the bill.

    Gordon Johns, who practices as an ophthalmologist at Pacific Cataract and Laser Institute in Chehalis, was among several speakers to ask about tort reform and medical malpractice laws.

    “We have to differentiate between a bad outcome and negligence,” he said.

    Johns received a standing ovation after voicing his frustration that many hard-working Americans end up paying the costs for others, from people in poverty to crooked Wall Street executives.

    “We’re responsible, we raise our kids, we pay our taxes, we vote, we go to church, we contribute to charity, but then we do all of these things, and when other people who don’t live the same lifestyle don’t follow those same principals, we are asked to bail them out,” he said, prompting wild applause from much of the crowd.

    Throughout the night, Baird stressed that the proposed public option would be given no greater subsidies than private plans and that “nobody, period, would be forced to choose the public option.”

    He also said that while illegal immigrants would have access to community clinics to prevent the spread of contagious diseases, none would be given health care insurance subsidies by the government.

    As for whether or not he and other members of Congress would accept the same health care plan for themselves being offered to constituents, he said “absolutely.”

    On several occasions, Baird revisited his comments from early August when his office initially planned to hold only telephone town halls due to what he called a “close to brown shirt tactics” and a “lynch mob mentality” evident at similar meetings across the country.

    “I overreacted,” Baird said. “I’m sorry for it. I should never have said that.”

    Baird answered to several speakers angry over the recently passed climate change bill that includes cap-and-trade measures. Baird said he voted for the bill, but only after a measure was included that allowed forest waste to be used as a renewable energy. He said that measure alone could result in thousands of jobs in the Northwest.

    By no means did he agree with everything in the bill, he said, adding that when the votes are already locked in for a bill he has to weigh the benefits of going against it.

    “If I go to the speaker of the House and say, ‘There is no way I would ever vote for this bill. This is what I want,’ it’s not going to work,” he said.   

    Eric Schwartz: (360) 807-8245

VIDEO

For a larger view of the video click here.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • randydutton

    randydutton Posts: 15

    On July 30, several veteran groups sent letters to Congress expressing their concerns on proposed health care legislation. On behalf of 24 million veterans they wrote “We are writing to express grave concerns about HR 3200, America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009. As currently drafted, we would oppose this legislation because it could limit the health care choices for veterans, increase the cost of health care for veterans, deny coverage to dependents family members of veterans, and threaten the quality of health care offered to veterans through VA health care system.” The letters, which I received today, run several pages, and I have provided the source documents to several newspapers. I further will post the documents on my blog site at www.ghgop.org. The pdf documents were provided to me directly by the Disabled American Veterans (DAV) association, and include official signatures of: VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars); AMVETS (American Veterans); DAV, Blinded Veterans Association; Jewish War Veterans of the USA; Military Order of the Purple Heart of the USA; Vietnam Veterans of America; The American Legion; Wounded Warrior Project; and Paralyzed Veterans of America. Among the issues of concern are: Penalty Tax for failure to enroll in an “acceptable” health insurance; disincentive for employers to hire members of the Reserve components; multiple health care options; independence of the DoD and VA health care systems; third party reimbursements for treatment of nonservice-connected conditions; and penalty tax on Reserve components Federalized or activated by the Governor. These are real concerns by real patriots and should not be dismissed as rantings of an ill-informed few.Such correspondence illustrates just how unacceptable this legislation is. We need to slow down the legislative process to allow reasoned debate, and improve upon our health care system with better options, maximum choices, and fiscal restraint.

     
  • Scooter

    Scooter Posts: 0

    In the Chronicle it states "Throughout the night, Baird stressed that the proposed public option would be given no greater subsidies than private plans and that “nobody, period, would be forced to choose the public option.”However, on Bairds own web site he has posted his own version of the Obamcare bill. In it he states that employer provided health care would be allowed for up to 4 years before the employee would have to switch to the federal Obamcare program. And retirees who have a healthcare package would be allowed to continue with their healthcare coverage for 10 years before having to switch to the federal Obamacare program. We can see that Baird counts on the people being uninformed. He's a double speaking Democrat and has no intension of doing what's best for the people in his district. He's going with the party agenda instead of the people.

     
  • Dave Smith

    Dave Smith Posts: 79

    It looks like candidate Trent hit his own personal lottery jackpot when he was selected for an opportunity to throw cheap shots at Baird.

     

Online poll

Do you believe in Bigfoot?

Loading…